In the end, after 10 years of rethinking and experiencing, everything was actually quite simple:
To see the new structures that will overcome the millennia-old antagonistic (unresolvable) bickering between women and men.
2 --> 3 is the logical shorthand for this, for the transition of gender relations from duality to triality, according to the great teacher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a German philosopher who is considered the most important representative of German idealism.

Thus, the antagonism is overcome in the synthesis of the Trinity.
This topic, by the way, is a good place for a simple definition of God: Who or what is God? Infinity, in the great as well as the small. That's why God cannot be defeated, outdone, changed, or imitated. It is pointless and it is the wrong path.
And now, in the age of triality, God wants to move back into families and father God's children there. From now on, the Jesus model applies to all women, not just to Mary.

A woman is always the nucleus, the nucleus of a family, the nucleus of an atom, and men are the electrons or the sperm.
The transformation of humanity from duality to trinity is absolutely comprehensive and fundamental. It means the addition of a third real human being.

Diligent sects explain evolution to us by saying that God or Jesus is now coming down directly to us and that the time of God's direct influence on society has begun. They are right, but they don't explain how this is supposed to happen in practice.

However, in this time of epochal change, a third category of human being comes into play, one that has actually always existed. In addition to the female-human and the male-human, there is also the God-human, who for thousands of years has been locked away in monasteries or churches that are dead during the week.

How do I define a God-man? In practice, these are people who, in whatever good way, have found their path to enlightenment. And in many religions, they are specifically prevented from having children, for example, with other enlightened women. Those who are enlightened carry the holy spirit of God within them, want to spread throughout the world, establish a sect, or integrate into a family and have children.

Yes, how??? Exactly right.
The family of the future essentially consists of one woman and two men. Because the triangle is the simplest and most stable form of balance, in complete contrast to polarity.
The hierarchical extended family has degenerated over the past few centuries into the obsessive nuclear family, where the poor children have to grow up in a sterile or explosive duality.
That's why modern society wants to abolish the family altogether, ideally sending children to daycare immediately after birth.
Completely wrong!!!
Whoever breaks the backbone of the family destroys the backbone of society.
All that is required is for a God-man, who is almost always male, to unite with a woman-man and a man-man to form a family of the Holy Trinity.

Why not the model with two women and one man? Because that doesn't make sense. After all, the woman does the most sacred work in a family: she bears the children and ensures the family's survival. She needs the support of men and will be much better off if two men help out in the family instead of just one.

And all three have equal rights and one vote.

Okay, still a question mark!?
In the current dual family, there is a clear hierarchy. The woman has a multitude of subtle techniques of domination; she controls sexuality; purely biologically, she surrounds the man's with her sexual organ. Despite appearances, she is internally the ruler of the family, simply because she bears direct biological responsibility for the offspring, and the men have nothing to counter her psychological dominance.

With a God-man, however, it's exactly the opposite. A woman will always look up to an enlightened man because he easily sees through her subtle techniques of domination. Quite simply because in a God-man, a woman stands directly opposite God, who, as we all know, always has the ultimate trump card or joker in infinity. Women naturally seek God; they love to talk to spiritual masters. But not necessarily to start a family because they fear they won't be able to control them.

Codo and Christian, I, jointly recommend that you think deeply about the idea of ​​a tribal nuclear family.
To recognize that the best society of all time can be formed in this way, because an optimal framework forms the inner structure.
And then, secondly, to meditate in detail on the many miserable problems from which humanity can free itself in this way.

August 7, 2013
To be continued

The campaign group campact.de, which we greatly value, recently provided us with a very welcome opportunity to share something relevant to this topic that has been absolutely annoying us for decades. Read it for yourself:

Dear friends of campact.de
I really liked many of your campaigns, especially for ecology and nature conservation, and I signed them. But this time, I'm really annoyed with you for jumping on this issue, for siding one-sidedly with the gay movement, and for using their battle terms like "homophobia."

What has been bothering me for some time is that a small, radical minority of gays and pedophiles around the world are trying to impose their questionable concepts of love on the majority.

Why doesn't anyone dare to say that we are threatened by sick concepts that want to gain power here in order to make as many other people sick as possible? Because anyone who demands lesbian and gay lifestyles as an equal and equal norm alongside the partnership between men and women is betraying the divine gift of love between the sexes, the union between the two halves of heaven. This has always been nature's dream, and sexuality functions accordingly.

Of course, lesbians and gays were discriminated against in the past, and I'm very glad that we here in Germany have learned to treat people with disabilities with respect, because they are, of course, human beings too. But the people affected, who for whatever reason cannot experience their love and eroticism with the other half of heaven, must finally admit to themselves that they are mentally ill, instead of trying to make as many other people sick as possible with their illness.

But gay propaganda, even as a school subject, as well as early sexualization in kindergarten, serve this goal of spreading disease in a truly perfidious way. This early sexualization in kindergarten or elementary school is particularly perverse because it damages children's intimacy and confronts them with these topics at an inopportune time.

What is the intention behind the EU and the state spending so much energy on psychologically manipulating and damaging children, thus increasing their chances of ending up as love cripples after puberty, whose path to the divine gift of fulfilling love and eroticism is blocked or severely hindered?

Why do they do this? Why are there no love therapists anywhere? And why do the Western media so uncritically participate in this gay propaganda? And why isn't there a mass outcry against the wave of early sexualization in European kindergartens and elementary schools?

Best regards,
Christian and Codo Friebe

P.S.
Dear friends of campact.de
If you publish this somewhere, you would have my utmost respect, because it goes against the grain and against your current campaign, and I would admire you for your courage, even internally. I assure you that my argument is absolutely sound, based on years of engagement with the topic of love and eroticism, and is by no means based on a momentary whim.

January 14, 2014
To be continued

In any case, there are only two genders: male and female. Everything else is brain-dead nonsense.

May 22, 2025
To be continued

2013 / 2014 / 2025